13F Portfolios

RTW INVESTMENTS, LP — CELCUITY INC CELC: Quarterly 13F Position History

RTW INVESTMENTS, LP has reported CELCUITY INC (CELC) on 2 13F-HR filings in Pactolio's tracked window, first appearing in Q4 2025. As of Q1 2026, the position is sized at 3,039,621 shares ($346.9M market value, 3.45% of the equity book). Quarter-over-quarter share count change: + 2,489,461 (+452.5%) .

Recent initiation: RTW INVESTMENTS, LP first reported CELC on the Q4 2025 filing — fewer than three quarters of history are available.

Quarterly 13F-HR Disclosure History Source: SEC 13F-HR filings, 2 quarter s

Quarter Shares QoQ Share Change Share Change (%) Market Value Weight Implied Price
Q1 2026 3,039,621 +2,489,461 +452.5% $346.9M 3.45% $114.14
Q4 2025 550,160 $54.9M 0.55% $99.74

Methodology & FAQ

How This Position History Is Sourced

Each row is one SEC Form 13F-HR filing disclosing this position. Share count, market value, and reported quarter are taken verbatim from the filing; portfolio weight is recomputed against the same filing's total reported equity book. Implied price-per-share is market value divided by shares — a quarter-end mark, not the manager's cost basis. See the full methodology document for the normalization rules.

When did RTW INVESTMENTS, LP first disclose a CELC position in 13F-HR filings?

RTW INVESTMENTS, LP first reported CELCUITY INC (CELC) on its 13F-HR filing for the period ending 2025-12-31 (Q4 2025). The position has appeared on 2 reported quarters within Pactolio's tracked window.

What was RTW INVESTMENTS, LP's most recent quarter-over-quarter share-count change in CELC?

Between Q4 2025 and Q1 2026, RTW INVESTMENTS, LP added 2,489,461 shares of CELC (+452.5%), bringing the total reported position to 3,039,621 shares at a market value of $346.9M.

Does the implied price-per-share represent RTW INVESTMENTS, LP's cost basis in CELC?

No. The implied price-per-share column is the 13F-HR reported market value divided by reported share count on the filing date (end of quarter). It is a quarter-end mark, not a cost basis or transaction price. Use it as a sanity check on the value column, not as an indicator of the manager's entry or exit price.