13F Portfolios

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — Quarter-over-Quarter 13F Allocation Shifts Q1 2026

In Q1 2026, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA initiated 4 new positions, increased allocation to 2 existing positions, trimmed 3 positions, and exited 1 position entirely. The fund's 13F equity book grew from $2.17B to $2.84B (+30.4% QoQ) . All deltas are sourced from sequential SEC Form 13F-HR filings; share-count changes reflect explicit trading activity, while weight changes can also include price movement. This page lists every position change reported — the portfolio overview shows a summary of the top shifts.

Net Portfolio Value Change

  • $2.17B
    Prior quarter
  • $2.84B
    Current quarter
  • + $0.66B
    Net delta
  • +30.4%
    % change

New Position Initiations Q1 2026

Securities disclosed for the first time in Q1 2026 that were not present in the prior 13F-HR filing.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA new positions in Q1 2026 — first-time disclosed long equity stakes
Company Ticker Initial Allocation Weight History
BLUE OWL TECHNOLOGY FINANCE OTF 13.03% History →
WORLD GOLD TR GLDM 4.70% History →
BLACKSTONE INC BX 2.62% History →
CARLYLE GROUP INC CG 2.59% History →

Largest Allocation Increases Q1 2026

Largest portfolio-weight increases in existing positions. Share-count delta is shown separately so price-only re-weighting can be distinguished from active adds.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA largest portfolio weight increases in Q1 2026
Company Ticker Δ Weight Δ Shares History
FACTSET RESH SYS INC FDS +0.35% +118.16% History →
STATE STREET CORPORATION STT +-6.74% +15.61% History →

Largest Allocation Reductions Q1 2026

Largest portfolio-weight decreases in existing positions (positions kept open at a lower allocation).

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA largest portfolio weight decreases in Q1 2026
Company Ticker Δ Weight Δ Shares History
BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC OWL -4.10% -98.89% Holders →
ASML HOLDING NV ASML -4.65% -17.72% History →
BROOKFIELD CORP BN -6.14% -0.00% History →

Exited Positions Q1 2026

Positions present in the prior 13F-HR filing that no longer appear in Q1 2026.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA fully exited positions in Q1 2026
Company Ticker Last-Reported Portfolio Weight
DIGITALBRIDGE GROUP INC DBRG 1.24%

Methodology & FAQ

How REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Quarterly Changes Are Computed

Each row above is computed by joining the most recent 13F-HR filing for REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA against the immediately preceding quarterly filing for the same fund. Portfolio weights are normalized to exclude listed options for comparability. A complete description of the methodology — including how confidential treatment filings are handled and why share count rather than weight is the cleaner trading signal — is documented in the Methodology.

Which positions did REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA initiate in Q1 2026?

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA established 4 new positions in Q1 2026: BLUE OWL TECHNOLOGY FINANCE (OTF, 13.03%), WORLD GOLD TR (GLDM, 4.70%), BLACKSTONE INC (BX, 2.62%), CARLYLE GROUP INC (CG, 2.59%).

Which existing positions saw the largest allocation increases for REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA in Q1 2026?

The largest portfolio-weight increases in existing positions were: FACTSET RESH SYS INC (FDS, +0.35% weight, +118.16% shares), STATE STREET CORPORATION (STT, +-6.74% weight, +15.61% shares).

Which positions did REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA fully exit in Q1 2026?

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA fully exited 1 position in Q1 2026: DIGITALBRIDGE GROUP INC (DBRG, last-reported weight 1.24%).

Which existing positions saw the largest allocation reductions for REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA in Q1 2026?

The largest portfolio-weight reductions in positions kept open were: BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC (OWL, -4.10% weight, -98.89% shares), ASML HOLDING NV (ASML, -4.65% weight, -17.72% shares), BROOKFIELD CORP (BN, -6.14% weight, -0.00% shares).

Do quarter-over-quarter 13F allocation changes constitute explicit trading signals?

No. Quarter-over-quarter changes reflect a combination of active trading and market price movement. A weight increase can result from price appreciation alone, without the manager adding shares. Share-count delta is the cleaner indicator of explicit trading activity.