13F Portfolios

RTW INVESTMENTS, LP: ERASCA INC (ERAS): Quarterly 13F Position History

As of Q2 2026, RTW INVESTMENTS, LP reported 17,946,754 shares of ERASCA INC (ERAS), worth $328.8M and representing 2.8% of its 13F equity book. Quarter-over-quarter share count change: + 1,789,579 (+11.1%) . The position first appeared in Q4 2025 and has been disclosed across 3 13F-HR filings in Pactolio's tracked window.

Quarterly 13F-HR Disclosure History Source: SEC 13F-HR filings, 3 quarter s

Quarter Shares QoQ Share Change Share Change (%) Market Value Weight Implied Price
Q2 2026 17,946,754 +1,789,579 +11.1% $328.8M 2.8% $18.3
Q1 2026 16,157,175 +16,010,524 +10917.4% $261.4M 2.6% $16.2
Q4 2025 146,651 $545.5K 0.0% $3.7

Methodology & FAQ

How This Position History Is Sourced

Each row is one SEC Form 13F-HR filing disclosing this position. Share count, market value, and reported quarter are taken verbatim from the filing; portfolio weight is recomputed against the same filing's total reported equity book. Implied price-per-share is market value divided by shares, a quarter-end mark rather than the manager's cost basis. See the full methodology document for the normalization rules.

When did RTW INVESTMENTS, LP first disclose a ERAS position in 13F-HR filings?

RTW INVESTMENTS, LP first reported ERASCA INC (ERAS) on its 13F-HR filing for the period ending 2025-12-31 (Q4 2025). The position has appeared on 3 reported quarters within Pactolio's tracked window.

What was RTW INVESTMENTS, LP's most recent quarter-over-quarter share-count change in ERAS?

Between Q1 2026 and Q2 2026, RTW INVESTMENTS, LP added 1,789,579 shares of ERAS (+11.1%), bringing the total reported position to 17,946,754 shares at a market value of $328.8M.

Does the implied price-per-share represent RTW INVESTMENTS, LP's cost basis in ERAS?

No. The implied price-per-share column is the 13F-HR reported market value divided by reported share count on the filing date (end of quarter). It is a quarter-end mark, not a cost basis or transaction price. Use it as a sanity check on the value column, not as an indicator of the manager's entry or exit price.